PROGRAM REVIEW in Associate of Arts in Teacher Preparation
| Completed by | Joy Guarin | AR Review Cycle | Fall 2014- Spring 2016 | |||
| Program Goals | ||||||
| Program Learning outcomes (Upon successful completion of this certificate, students will be able to) 1. Demonstrate basic knowledge of the foundations and concepts related to elementary education. 2. Demonstrate familiarity with a variety of instruction strategies for elementary school students. 3. Demonstrate basic knowledge in the following areas: art, communication, humanities, language, literature, science, and social sciences. | ||||||
| Program History | ||||||
| This section describes the history of the program. This includes the date and reason of implementation, significant milestones in the development of the program, and significant current activities. | ||||||
| In 2009, Associated of Science degree program in teacher education-elementary program at state campuses was phased out and was replaced by the Associate of Arts degree program in teacher preparation program . The program started at Yap campus in summer of 2009 with 2 students . | ||||||
| Program Description | ||||||
| The program description describes the program, including its organization, relationship to other programs in the system, program design, degree(s) offered, and other significant features of the program, such as elements/resources for forward-looking new program contributions to the state’s economy, or specialized program accreditation. | ||||||
This program provide students with courses rich in content, theoretical foundations and practical experiences (methodology) which are designed to address the needs of pre-service and in –service teachers who may want to pursue the baccalaureate degree at UOG (College Catalog). | ||||||
| Program Admission Requirements | ||||||
| This section describes the requirements for admission into the program and other requisites. | ||||||
| High School graduates and General Educational Development( GED) certificate holders who are not accepted into or are not interested in a degree program may apply for admission into an entry level certificate of achievement program. Applicants with significantly low scores are ineligible for admission. Other certificates of achievement program are offered when criteria for offering the program are met. Admissions requirements vary with the program. Application forms are available at Yap campus. | ||||||
| Program Certificate/Degree Requirements | ||||||
| This section specifies the requirements for obtaining a certificate/degree in the program, including specific courses,, sequencing of courses, total credits, internships, practical, etc. | ||||||
| General Education Core Requirements ………………………………………………………………………………………29 Credits English (9 credits) · English (9 credits) , EN 110 Advanced Reading (3) , EN 120a Expository Writing (3), EN 120b Expository Writing II (3) · Mathematics (3 credits) , Any 100 level mathematics course · Natural Sciences (7 credits) · Social Sciences (3 credits) , SS 150 History of Micronesia (3) Computer Applications (3) , CA 100 Computer Literacy (3) · Physical Education (1 credit) Any choice of any ESS offering (1) · Humanities (3 credits) , Any course in music, history, literature, philosophy, or language (recommended: MU 101) (3) Major Requirements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..40 Credits AR 101 Intro to Art (3) · ED 210 Intro to Professional Teaching (3) · ED 215 Intro to exceptional Children (3) · ED/PY 201 Human Growth and Development (3) · EN 200 series (EN 201 Introduction to Literature (3) EN 205 Literature of the Sea (3) · EN 208 Introduction to Philosophy (3) EN.CO 205 Speech Communication (3) · ED 292 Practicum Observation and Participation (3) MS/ ED 210 Math for Teachers (3) Science with lab (4) · SS 120 Introduction to Geography (3) · SS 126 Pacific Geography or SS 170 World History or SS 171 World History II (3) SS/PY 101 General Psychology (3) GRADUATION REQUIREMENT …………………………………………………………………………………………………….70 Credits | ||||||
| Program Courses and Enrollment | ||||||
| This section lists courses offered in the program, including number of sections, course enrollment, section fill rates, and redundancy of courses across the institution. | ||||||
| Program Enrollment Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016 Total 32 32 32 26 122 Enrollment during the last four semesters are above 25. Number of Sections, Course enrollment Courses Number Number of section Course Enrollment Semester EN 201 1 30 Fall 2014 SC 130 1 20 Fall 2014 ED 210 1 10 Fall 2014 ED 292 1 6 Fall 2014 PY 101 1 16 Fall 2014 ED 215 1 12 Spring 2015 SC 120 1 23 Spring 2015 SS 170 1 14 Spring 2015 ED 292 1 4 Spring 2015 AR 101 1 15 Spring 2015 MS/ED 210 1 15 Fall 2015 SS 170 1 6 Fall 2015 SC 130 1 21 Fall 2015 PY 201 1 7 Fall 2015 AR 101 1 9 Fall 2015 EN 208 1 11 Spring 2016 ED 292 1 1 Spring 2016 SC 120 1 23 Spring 2016 ED/PY101 1 14 Spring 2016 SS 170 1 10 Spring 2016 | ||||||
| Program Faculty | ||||||
| This section reports the faculty of the program, including full-time and part-time faculty. The degrees held and rank are provided for the full-time and part-time faculty. Finally, provide the faculty student ratio for the program. | ||||||
| Name of Faculty Full time/Part time Degrees held Rank 1. Joy Guarin Full time DVM.,MS, PhD Professor 2. Jovita Masiwemai Full time MEd., BA, AS Assistant Professor 3. Rosa Tacheliol Full time MEd, BA Assistant professor 4. Rhoda Velasquez Full time MA Med, PhD. ongoing, BSE Associate Professor 5. Robert Yangerluo Full time MA, BA Assistant Professor Faculty student ratio for the program For 2014-2016 Number of Faculty Number of students Faculty Student Ratio 5 122 1:24 | ||||||
| Program Indicators | ||||||
| This section provides the data for analyzing the extent to which the program has achieved the established outcomes and criteria. This is the most important part of the program review. The data that will be collected and evaluated are the following: | ||||||
| Assess-ment of course student learning out-comes of program courses | Table 1.Fall 2014 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of stu-dents with “W” 5 No. of stud-ents successful of SLO 1 5 SLO 2 5 SLO 3 5 SLO 4 5 SLO 5 5 SLO 6 5 SLO 7 5 SLO 8 Percent-age required CLOs MS/ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 7 0 7 7 7 7 100 EN/CO 205 Rosa Tacheliol 17 0 17 17 16 17 17 99 EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 13 0 12 10 11 10 83 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 6 0 6 6 6 6 100 SC 130 Joy Guarin 20 1 19 19 19 19 19 19 95 ED 210 Darrell Hollloman 10 0 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 85 ED/PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 8 1 7 7 7 7 7 88 SS 120 Robert Yangerluo 9 1 6 6 6 6 67 SC/SS 115 Joy Guarin 11 0 11 10 96 SS/PY 101 Robert Yangerluo 16 0 13 13 11 12 77 Average 89 Note: EN 201, EN/CO 205, SS 170, SC 130, SS PY 101,SC/SS 115- students are combined with other program Table 2. Spring 2015 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of stu-dents with “W” 5 No. of stud-ents success-ful of SLO 1 5 SLO 2 5 SLO 3 5 SLO 4 5 SLO 5 5 SLO 6 5 SLO 7 5 SLO 8 Percentage required CLOs SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 14 0 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 86 SC 120 Joy Guarin 23 1 22 22 22 20 19 19 90 ED 215 Darrell Holloman 12 1 11 10 9 10 11 85 EN 208 Rosa Tacheliol 30 1 26 28 27 90 ED 292 Darrell Holloman 4 0 4 4 4 4 100 Average 90 Note: SS 170, SC 120, PY 101, AR 101- students are combined with other program Table 3 .Fall 2015 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of stu-dents with “W” 5 No. of stud-ents success-ful of SLO 1 5 SLO 2 5 SLO 3 5 SLO 4 5 SLO 5 5 SLO 6 5 SLO 7 5 SLO 8 SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 6 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 SC 130 Joy Guarin 21 0 21 21 19 19 19 19 19 SS 120 Robert Yangerluo 18 1 18 18 18 18 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 2 0 2 2 2 2 EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 15 0 12 12 12 12 ED/PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 7 1 6 6 6 6 6 SC 111 Joy Guarin 15 3 10 13 13 12 10 12 12 14 MS ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 15 1 15 15 15 15 Average Continuation 5 SLO 6 5 SLO 7 5 SLO 8 Percentage required CLOs 100 93 100 100 80 86 14 14 14 78 100 Average 92% Table 4. Spring 2016 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of stu-dents with “W” 5 No. of stud-ents success-ful of SLO 1 5 SLO 2 5 SLO 3 5 SLO 4 5 SLO 5 5 SLO 6 5 SLO 7 5 SLO 8 Percentage required CLOs SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 10 0 7 7 7 7 7 70 SC 120 Joy Guarin 23 1 21 13 21 15 16 75 EN 208 Rosa Tacheliol 10 2 6 6 6 60 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 1 0 1 1 1 1 100 PY 101 Robert Yangerluo 14 2 10 10 10 10 71 Average 75% Note: SS 170, SC 120, PY 101, AR 101- students are combined with other program CSLOs achievement percentage-87% | |||||
| Assessment of program student learning outcomes | Program Student Learning Outcomes(PSLOs) At the completion of Pre-Teacher Preparation Program, the student will be able to: 1. Demonstrate basic knowledge of the foundations and concepts related to elementary education. 2. Demonstrate familiarity with a variety of instruction strategies for elementary school students. 3. Demonstrate basic knowledge in the following areas: art, communication, humanities, language, literature, science, and social sciences. What we looked at: The Yap Campus focused on number 2 PSLO. Listed below is the assessment plans for the above mentioned PSLO. • PSLO #2: Develop a rubric to assess lesson delivery in their practicum course What we found: • For PSLO #2, 6 of 6 or 100% of students achieved an average of 91% on their lesson delivery (Fall 2014) • For PSLO #2, 4 of 4 or 100% of students achieved an average of 95% on their lesson delivery (Spring 2015) • For PSLO #2, 2 of 2 or 100% of students achieved an average of 88.5% on their lesson delivery(Fall 2015) What we are planning to work on: Continue to use cooperative learning strategies. Recommendations for students: Continue to keep up the good performance and attitudes in class. Enroll in higher education program. | |||||
| Program enrollment (historical enrollment patterns, student credits by major) | Table 1A. Enrollment patterns by major Term Number of Enrolled students (Yap) Overall number of students enrolled (Chuuk,Pohnpei Kosrae, National, and Yap) Percentage (%) Fall 2014 32 307 10 Spring 2015 32 239 13 Fall 2015 32 235 14 Spring 2016 26 217 12 Average 31 250 12% Table 1B. Enrollment of the program as compared to the total enrollment of Yap campus Term Number of Enrolled students (Yap) Yap Campus enrollment Percentage (%) Fall 2014 32 188 17 Spring 2015 32 191 17 Fall 2015 32 183 18 Spring 2016 26 162 16 Average 31 181 17 Table 2 Credits by major Term Number of Credits of Enrolled students (Yap) Overall number of students enrolled (Chuuk,Pohnpei Kosrae, National, and Yap) Percentage Fall 2014 276 3583 8 Spring 2015 340 3354 10 Fall 2015 380 2778 14 Spring 2016 258 2557 10 Average 313.5 3068 10% * Average enrollment of 31 or 12% at Yap campus . Same enrollment of 32 for 3 semester (Fall 2014, Spring 2015, and Fall 2015) and decrease to 26 during the Spring 2016. *Average number of credits of enrolled students is 313.5. | |||||
| Average class size | Table 1 Average class size Term 1 Section 2 Enroll/Max 3 Enrollment 4 Enroll/Ratio (3/2) 5 Average Class Size 3/1) Fall 2014 5 125 82 66 16 Spring 2015 5 113 68 60 12 Fall 2015 5 126 58 46 9 Spring 2016 5 123 59 48 10 Average 12 *Average class size is 12 | |||||
| Course completion rate | Table 1. Fall 2014 Completion Rate per Course 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of students with “W” 5 Number of students with a grade of D/F 6 Number of students completed the course with C and up 7 Completion rate (6/3) MS/ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 7 0 0 7 100 EN/CO 205 Rosa Tacheliol 17 0 1 16 94 EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 13 0 1 12 92 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 6 0 0 6 100 SC 130 Joy Guarin 20 1 0 19 95 ED 210 Darrell Hollloman 10 0 2 8 80 ED/PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 8 1 0 7 88 SS 120 Robert Yangerluo 9 1 1 7 78 SC 115 Joy Guarin 11 0 1 10 91 SS/PY 101 Robert Yangerluo 16 0 3 13 81 Average 117 3 9 90% Note: AR 101, SC 120, PY 101- students are combined with other program Table 2. Spring 2015 Completion Rate per Course 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of students with “W” 5 Number of students with a grade of F 6 Number of students completed the course 7 Completion rate (6/3) SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 14 0 2 12 86 SC 120 Joy Guarin 23 1 5 17 74 ED 215 Darrell Holloman 12 1 2 9 75 EN 208 Rosa Tacheliol 30 1 4 25 83 ED 292 Darrell Holloman 4 0 0 4 100 AR 101 Karen Simion 15 0 5 10 67 Total/Average Rate 98 3 18 81% Note: SS 170, SC 120, PY 101- students are combined with other program Table 3. Fall 2015 Completion Rate per Course 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of students with “W” 5 Number of students with a grade of F 6 Number of students completed the course 7 Completion rate (6/3) SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 6 1 0 6 100 SC 130 Joy Guarin 21 0 2 19 91 SS 120 Robert Yangerluo 18 1 1 17 94 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 2 0 0 2 100 EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 15 0 3 12 80 ED/PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 7 1 1 6 86 SC 111 Joy Guarin 18 3 0 15 83 MS ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 16 1 0 15 94 AR 101 Karen Simion 13 4 0 9 69 Average 116 11 7 89% Note: SS 170, SC 120, PY 101, AR 101- students are combined with other program Table 5. Spring 2016 Completion Rate per Course 1 Course No. 2 Instructor Name 3 No. of students enrolled 4 No. of students with “W” 5 Number of students with a grade of F 6 Number of students completed the course 7 Completion rate (6/3) SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 10 0 2 7 70 SC 120 Joy Guarin 23 1 2 20 87 EN 208 Rosa Tacheliol 10 2 1 7 70 ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 1 0 0 1 100 PY 101 Robert Yangerluo 14 2 3 9 64 Total/Average Rate 58 5 8 78% Note: EN 201, EN/CO 205, SS 170, SC 130, SS PY 101- students are combined with other program Rate of students with W- 5.7 %; Rate of students with a grade of F/D-11 %; General completion rate- 84.5% | |||||
| Student persistence rate (semester to semester) | Persistence rate is based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following Spring semester. 1 Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2014 2 Same students, Spring 2015 2/1 Persistence Rate (%) 1 1 100 1 Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2015 2 Same students, Spring 2016 2/1 Persistence Rate (%) 7 6 86 Persistence rate- Fall 2014 to Spring 2015- 100%; Fall 2015-Spring 2016- 86% | |||||
| Student retention rate (Fall-to-Fall for two-year programs; Fall-to-Spring for one-year programs) | Retention rate is based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following the Spring semester 1 Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2014 2 Same students, Fall 2015 2/1 Retention Rate (%) 1 1 100 1 Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2015 2 Same students, Fall 2016 2/1 Retention Rate (%) 7 2 29 Retention Rate –Fall 2014-Fall 2015- 100%; Fall 2015-Fall 2016- 29% | |||||
| Success rates on licensing or certification exams (CTE, TP, Nursing, etc) | NONE | |||||
| Graduation rate based on yearly number | Term Number of Graduates Fall 2014 5 Spring 2015 6 Fall 2015 6 Spring 2016 4 Total 21 | |||||
| Students seat cost | At the present tuition rate of $135 per credit the total seat cost per student completing this program is $5400. The table below shows detailed information. Major Courses Credits CPC CPS AR 101 3 $ 135 $ 405 ED 210 3 $ 135 $ 405 ED 215 3 $ 135 $ 405 ED/PY 201 3 $ 135 $ 405 EN 201 3 $ 135 $ 405 EN 205 3 $ 135 $ 405 EN 208 3 $ 135 $ 405 EN.CO 205 3 $ 135 $ 405 ED 292 3 $ 135 $ 405 MS/ ED 210 3 $ 135 $ 405 Science with lab 4 $ 135 $ 540 SS 120 3 $ 135 $ 405 SS 126 3 $ 135 $ 405 SS/PY 101 3 $ 135 $ 405 TOTAL 44 $5940 Major Requirements 40 $5400 CPC- Cost Per Credit, CPS- Cost Per Student | |||||
| Cost of duplicate or redundant courses, programs or services | ||||||
| Students’ satisfaction rate | A survey was conducted on teachers behaviors for each class at the end of every semester. There were 10 items in the survey and students were asked to rate each class according to these items on a scale of 1 to 5; 1 being never , 2 is rarely, 3 as sometimes, 4 is usually and 5 being always. The following are the items used in the survey 1 Overall, this instructor was effective. 2 The instructor welcomed and encouraged questions and comments. 3 The instructor presented the course content clearly. 4 The instructor emphasized the major points and concept. 5 The instructor was always well prepared. 6 The instructor made sure that the students were aware of the Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) for the course. 7 The instructor gave clear directions and explained activities or assignments that emphasized the course SLOs. 8 The instructor planned class time and assignments that encouraged problem solving and critical thinking. 9 The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject. 10 I received feedback on assignments/quizzes/exams in time to prepare for the next assignment/quiz/exam. Students’ Satisfaction Survey Results(Weighted Means) Legend: N -Number of students; AWM Average Weighted Mean; D – Descriptive Equivalent;U– Usually; A- Always The table below shows detailed information on the students’ satisfaction survey during Fall 2014. Instructor Subject N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WM DE ED 210 Darrell Holloman 8 4.3 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.8 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.52 A EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 11 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.85 A EN CO 205 Rosa Tacheliol 15 4.9 5 4.9 4.9 4.9 5 5 4.9 5 5 4.96 A ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.8 5 5 4.98 A MS/ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 5 5 5 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.76 A SC 115 Joy Guarin 6 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.7 A SC 130 Joy Guarin 17 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.5 A SS 120 Robert Yangerluo 8 4.4 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.54 A SS PY 101 Robert Yangerluo 12 4 4.1 3.6 4.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 4 4 4 3.93 U PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 7 4 4.3 4.4 4.3 3.7 4.1 4 4 4.1 4.1 4.12 A Joy Guarin SC 111 9 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.4 4.64 A Joy Guarin SC 120 17 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.6 4.64 A Robert Yangerluo SS 170 12 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.7 4.5 4.4 A Darrell Holloman ED 215 10 4.3 4.5 4 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.4 A Darrell Holloman ED 292 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 A Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Instructor Subject N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WM DE EN 201 Rosa Tacheliol 13 4.85 4.85 4.92 4.85 4.77 4.92 4.85 4.85 4.92 4.54 4.83 A ED 292 Rosa Tacheliol 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 A MS/ED 210 Rhoda Velasquez 12 4.58 4.5 4.67 4.58 4.66 4.58 4.58 4.67 4.67 4.5 4.6 A SC 130 Joy Guarin 18 4.78 4.72 4.72 4.72 4.89 4.78 4.67 4.75 4.83 4.83 4.77 A SC 111 Joy Guarin 15 4.6 4.47 4.53 4.73 4.8 4.6 4.67 4.47 4.87 4.67 4.64 A SS 170 Robert Yangerluo 6 4.33 4.67 4.5 4.3 4.67 4.5 4.5 4.67 4.67 4.67 4.55 A PY 201 Robert Yangerluo 5 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.44 A Average of general weighted means is 4.62 or “Always” | |||||
| Alumni data | ||||||
| Employmen data and employer feedback (employer survey) | Graduate Number Year Working? Location In School? Location 1-4 Fall 2014 Yes DOE 5-6 Fall 2014 Yes Yap Campus/ Fiji 1-3 Spring 2015 Yes DOE 4-6 Spring 2015 Yes 2-States; 1- National 1-4 Fall 2015 Yes DOE 5- 6 Fall 2015 No 1-4 Spring 2016 Yes DOE Graduates from Fall 2014-Spring 2016 15 or 71.4% of the graduates are working for DOE | |||||
| Program added or cancelled at nearby regional institutions (PCC, GCC, Hawaii schools, UOG, CMI, NMC) | NONE Average enrollment of 31 or 12% at Yap campus . A decrease in enrollment and credits by major from Spring 2015 to Spring 2016 in overall enrollment (in all campuses) . * Average number of credits of enrolled students is 313.5. | |||||
| Transfer rate | ||||||
| Analysis | ||||||
| Findings This section provides discussion of information discovered as a result of the evaluation such as problems or concerns with the program and what part of the program is working well and meeting expectation. | Enrollment during the last four semesters are above 25. One section was opened for all courses offered during the last four semesters . 5 out of 29 courses offered during the last four semesters had students less than 10. Majority of the courses is the ED 292 which is Practicum Observation and Application class. Faculty Student Ratio is 1:24 Course Level Assessments was completed during Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2015 and Spring 2016. CSLOs achievement percentage-87% Average enrollment of 31 or 12% at Yap campus . Same enrollment of 32 for 3 semester (Fall 2014, Spring 2015, and Fall 2015) and decrease to 26 during the Spring 2016. Average number of credits of enrolled students is 313.5. Average class size is 12 Rate of students with W- 5.7 %; Rate of students with a grade of F/D-11 %; General completion rate- 84.5% Persistence rate- Fall 2014 to Spring 2015- 100%; Fall 2015-Spring 2016- 86%. Retention Rate –Fall 2014-Fall 2015- 100%; Fall 2015-Fall 2016- 29% Number of Graduates during the FY 2014 to FY 2016 is 21. During Fall 2014, Spring 2015, and Fall 2015 instructors were evaluated by the Students. Average of general weighted means is 4.62 or “Always” Most graduates are employed at the DOE (15 out of 21 or 71.4%) | |||||
| Recommendations This section provides recommendations from the program on what to do to improve or enhance the quality of program and course learning outcomes as well as program goals and objectives. This section should also include suggestions that describe how the program might be able to create opportunities for a better program in the future. Some examples are exploring alternate delivery mechanisms, forming external partnerships, or realigning with other programs. | 1. Need to know the reason why students withdraw. 2. Course Level Assessment should be completed by faculty every semester. 3. The following are the suggestions from the Course Level Assessments: ED 292 Observation Practicum- Tests, rubrics, and checklists (classroom Observation and Lesson Delivery) accompany ED 292 text from COM- FSM for uniformity throughout the COM-FSM campus. MS 100 College Algebra-Additional white board inside the classroom is needed to cater more space on math illustrations during class discussion and lecture. ED/PY 201 I like teaching classes that are more than 12 students in attendance- it will be nice to teach this class with at least 15-20 students. We get more of a variety of open discussion and group work/presentation. ED 292 Observation Practicum – Tests, rubrics, and checklists (classroom Observation and Lesson Delivery) accompany ED 292 text from COM- FSM for uniformity throughout the COM-FSM campus. | |||||
